Press release issued 31 August 2001
EIUG welcomed the publication today of Ofgem's reports on
the new electricity trading arrangements (NETA) which went live in March 2001.
Ofgem's findings are encouraging but far from the final word
on the subject, not least because the system is still relatively new and has
yet to be tested over a high demand period in winter. Since going live five
months ago, NGC's daily balancing costs have declined and the spread between
buy and sell prices in the balancing mechanism has reduced, indicating that the
system is operating more efficiently. Modifications are currently being
considered which may stabilise prices further. However, some serious concerns
remain from a customer's point of view:
- lack of liquidity in the traded markets
- lack of activity on the demand side
- difficulties faced by smaller generators under the new
regime
The key question is: will these features of the system
remain as the market matures, or are they symptomatic of structural problems
which will require further reform to put right? EIUG has an open mind on these
issues and is conducting its own review to assess the overall impact on its
members.
Jeremy Nicholson, EIUG's Economic Adviser, commented: "We
said NETA would give customers a fairer deal and the evidence so far seems to
support that. Changes may be needed to support renewables generation, but we
should be careful not loose the principal benefits NETA is delivering to
customers."
Notes to editors:
- NETA replaced the electricity pool, a system open to
manipulation by generators resulting in unnecessarily high electricity prices
and poor value to customers.
- Contract prices to industrial customers dropped 10-15%
partly in anticipation of a more competitive market after NETA went live,
saving energy-intensive users around £60m a year in electricity costs.
- EIUG represents the energy-intensive industries whose
business depends on competitive energy supplies, and who purchase around 20% of
the electricity sold to end users in the UK market.
|